Can homosexuality or transsexualism be biologically determined ?
This chapter will demonstrate that there are
numerous indications of biological determinants of homosexuality and
transsexualism. In humans, genetic
differences, brain differences,
endocrinological differences, and
neuropsychological differences have been documented between these two groups
and «straight» comparison groups. All
of these will be reviewed in detail in pages that follow. One problem in concluding from such
evidence that homosexuality or transsexualism can be biologically determined is
that you can never argue that biological
factors would be sufficient cause for such upheavals of sexual orientation or
identity. However, if one were to observe, say, a
full fledged preferential and durable homosexual relationship in intact animals, then given that culture as we know it does
not exist for them, we would have an
existence proof of biological determination as sufficient cause.
Such an existence proof has indeed been provided in the scientific
research literature for homosexuality.
In a 1976 issue of the juornal Archives of Sexual Behavior Erwin
and Maple described a relationship in Rhesus monkeys in which the two males
prefered each other for sexual contact over a sexually receptive unfamiliar
female.
Sexual genotypic and phenotypic configurations. The way I see it, there are two fundamental aspects of human
sexuality, sexual orientation (the
object of one's sexual desire) and sexual identity (whether a person
subjectively feels like a man or like a woman). Nature delivers us, the vast majority of times, encased in a clearly male-looking or
female-looking body. The various forms
of apparent hermaphroditism are the exception.
Our sexual appearance, feelings, desires and behavior are
phenotypical, they are the manifestations
of things largely determined by our genes (genotype). Of course, not all inflections of inner life
and behavior are direct emanations of our genes. However, as I shall explain, the big picture (our basic sexual orientation
and sexual identity) certainly is
determined, to a very large extent, by
details of brain anatomy and brain physiology.
Most of this brain anatomy and physiology is directly determined by our
genes, and most of the balance is greatly determined by congenital factors (not
necessarily hereditary, but nevertheless biological and present at birth: trisomy-21 or Down’s syndrome is a congenital
non-hereditary condition consisting of an accident of meiosis occurring before
birth). Of course, extremely disfavorable environmental
conditions (maternal alcoholism or malnutrition) can play a part in congenital
defects. However, curiously,
even though there is a much greater heterogeneity of psychosexual
configurations in genotypic males, the
details of phenotypic expression are under tighter genetic and/or congenital
control in males than in females of the human species. In other words, atypical sexual orientation
or identity in genotypic females is relatively
more influenced by life experience, i.e., by culture, and relatively less by
nature. The typical sexual configuration
is that the XY individual is, by definition, a genotypic male, feels like a male, and is sexually attracted
to females. Likewise, the typical XX individual is by definition a
genotypic female, feels like a female,
and is attracted to males. You knew that
! Let’s review the neuropsychology of
variations of this basic normal configuration.
Post Comment
No comments