Drugs that affect absorption of glucose
Α-Glucosidase inhibitors
competitively inhibit the Α-glucosidase enzymes in the gut that digest dietary
starch and sucrose. Two of these drugs-acarbose and miglitol-are available for
clinical use. Both are potent inhibitors of glucoamylase, Α-amylase, and
sucrase but have less effect on isomaltase and hardly any on trehalase and
lactase. Acarbose binds 1000 times more avidly to the intestinal
disaccharidases than do products of carbohydrate digestion or sucrose. A fundamental
difference between acarbose and miglitol is in their absorption. Acarbose has
the molecular mass and structural features of a tetrasaccharide, and very
little (about 2%) crosses the microvillar membrane. Miglitol, however, has a
structural similarity with glucose and is absorbable. Both drugs delay the
absorption of carbohydrate and lower postprandial glycemic excursion.
a. Acarbose
Acarbose is available as 50-mg and
100-mg tablets. The recommended starting dose of acarbose is 50 mg twice daily,
gradually increasing to 100 mg three times daily. For maximal benefit on
postprandial hyperglycemia, acarbose should be given with the first mouthful of
food ingested. In diabetic patients, it reduces postprandial hyperglycemia by
30-50%, and its overall effect is to lower the HbA1c by 0.5-1%.
The principal adverse effect, seen
in 20-30% of patients, is flatulence. This is caused by undigested carbohydrate
reaching the lower bowel, where gases are produced by bacterial flora. In 3% of
cases, troublesome diarrhea occurs. This gastrointestinal discomfort tends to
discourage excessive carbohydrate consumption and promotes improved compliance
of type 2 patients with their diet prescriptions. When acarbose is given alone,
there is no risk of hypoglycemia. However, if combined with insulin or
sulfonylureas, it might increase the risk of hypoglycemia from these agents. A
slight rise in hepatic aminotransferases has been noted in clinical trials with
acarbose (5% versus 2% in placebo controls, and particularly with doses >
300 mg/d). The levels generally return to normal on stopping the drug.
In the UKPDS, approximately 2000
patients on diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin therapy were randomized
to acarbose or placebo therapy. By 3 years, 60% of the patients had discontinued
the drug, mostly because of gastrointestinal symptoms. If one looked only at
the 40% who remained on the drug, they had an 0.5% lower HbA1c
compared with placebo.
b. Miglitol
Miglitol is similar to acarbose in
terms of its clinical effects. It is indicated for use in diet- or
sulfonylurea-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Therapy is initiated at the
lowest effective dosage of 25 mg three times a day. The usual maintenance dose
is 50 mg three times a day, although some patients may benefit from increasing
the dose to 100 mg three times a day. Gastrointestinal side effects occur as
with acarbose. The drug is not metabolized and is excreted unchanged by the
kidney. Theoretically, absorbable Α-glucosidase inhibitors could induce a
deficiency of one or more of the Α-glucosidases involved in cellular glycogen
metabolism and biosynthesis of glycoproteins. This does not occur in practice
because, unlike the intestinal mucosa, which sees a high concentration of the
drug, the blood level is 200-fold to 1000-fold lower than the concentration needed
to inhibit intracellular Α-glucosidases. Miglitol should not be used in renal
failure, when its clearance would be impaired.
A glyburide and metformin
combination (Glucovance) is available in dose forms of 1.25 mg/250 mg, 2.5 mg/500
mg, and 5 mg/500 mg. A rosiglitazone and metformin combination (Avandamet) is
available in dose forms of 1 mg/500 mg, 2 mg/500 mg, and 4 mg/500 mg. These
drug combinations, however, limit the clinician's ability to optimally adjust
dosage of the individual drugs and for that reason are of questionable
usefulness.
The UKPDS has put to rest previous
concerns regarding the safety of sulfonylureas. It did not confirm any
cardiovascular hazard among over 1500 patients treated intensively with
sulfonylureas for over 10 years, compared with a comparable number who received
either insulin or diet therapy. Analysis of a subgroup of obese patients
receiving metformin also showed no hazard and even a slight reduction in cardiovascular
deaths compared with conventional therapy.
The currently available
thiazolidinediones have not to date exhibited the idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity
seen with troglitazone. However, these drugs can precipitate congestive heart
failure and should not be used in patients with New York Heart Association
class III and IV cardiac status. Lactic acidosis from metformin (see above) is
quite rare and probably not a major problem with its use in the absence of
major risk factors such as impaired renal or hepatic disease or conditions
predisposing to hypoxia.
Oral glucose provokes a threefold to
fourfold higher insulin response than an equivalent dose of glucose given
intravenously because the oral glucose causes a release of gut hormones, principally
glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic
polypeptide (GIP1), which amplify the glucose-induced insulin release. This
"incretin effect" has been reported to be impaired in patients with
type 2 diabetes. GLP-1, when infused in patients with type 2 diabetes,
stimulates insulin secretion and lowers glucose levels. GLP-1, however, is
rapidly proteolysed by dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP IV) and is not a practical
therapeutic agent. Exenatide is a GLP-1 analog that is more resistant to DPP IV
action, and it lowers blood glucose and HbA1c levels when given
subcutaneously twice a day to patients with type 2 diabetes. Oral DPP IV
inhibitors, which work by prolonging the action of endogenously released GLP-1,
are also in clinical trials for use in type 2 diabetes.
Insulin is indicated for type 1
diabetes as well as for type 2 diabetic patients with insulinopenia whose
hyperglycemia does not respond to diet therapy either alone or combined with
oral hypoglycemic drugs.
With the development of highly
purified human insulin preparations, immunogenicity has been markedly reduced,
thereby decreasing the incidence of therapeutic complications such as insulin
allergy, immune insulin resistance, and localized lipoatrophy at the injection
site. However, the problem of achieving optimal insulin delivery remains
unsolved with the present state of technology. It has not been possible to
reproduce the physiologic patterns of intraportal insulin secretion with
subcutaneous injections of soluble or longer-acting insulin suspensions. Even
so, with the help of appropriate modifications of diet and exercise and careful
monitoring of capillary blood glucose levels at home, it has often been
possible to achieve acceptable control of blood glucose by using various
mixtures of short- and longer-acting insulins injected at least twice daily or
portable insulin infusion pumps.
Post Comment
No comments