Neuroprotection in stroke: slowing down AMPK activation
Lack of blood
and oxygen after ischemic stroke causes disruption of cell ion homeostasis and
lead to neuronal cell death. To repair the damage and return neurons to
homeostasis, a number of energy-consuming processes are activated.
Overactivation of these pathways during ischemia can lead to complete energy
failure and cell death. Activation of AMPK was initially considered to be an
adaptive response due to altered AMP/ATP ratio in response to ischemia,
hypoxia, or glucose deprivation (Culmsee et al., 2001; Gadalla et al., 2004; McCullough et al., 2005)
but there has been some discordance about the outcome on cell survival and
neuroprotection. Some groups proposed that AMPK represents an endogenous
neuroprotective pathway conserving cellular energy levels under conditions of
intense metabolic stress (Culmsee et al., 2001)
or ischemic injury in addition to limiting neuronal injury via excitotoxicity (Kuramoto et al., 2007).
Conversely, McCullough and coworkers suggested that AMPK over-activation is
detrimental in models of ischemia reperfusion (McCullough et al., 2005).
Pharmacological and genetic approaches were used to clarify the role of AMPK in
stroke outcome. AMPK inhibition with Compound C or with the fatty acid synthase
inhibitor C75 (which reduces AMPK activation indirectly) provided sustained
neuroprotection after stroke (Li et al., 2007).
Similarly, AMPKa2
knockout mice were protected from stroke damage (Li et al., 2007).
Furthermore, the beneficial effect of Compound C was lost in AMPKa2
knockout mice implying that targeting neuronal energy balance during cerebral
ischemia may be therapeutic (Li et al., 2007).
However, the physiological consequences of AMPK activation after hypoxic stress
on cerebral vasculature has been poorly investigated and it is not known if
AMPK activation exacerbates or ameliorates cerebral blood flow. In contrast,
regarding peripheral vasculartue, many studies confirmed the beneficial effects
of pharmacological AMPK activation (Bradley et al., 2010; Davis et al., 2006; Evans et al.,
2005; Rubin et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2009),
thereby favoring blood flow. Some of the protective actions of AMPK have been
related to the activation of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) and formation of
NO, which is a central signaling molecule in the vasculature (Zou and Wu, 2008). AMPK has been shown to
enhance eNOS activity by direct phosphorylation of Ser1177 (Chen et al., 2000; Chen et al., 1999),
Ser633 (Chen et al., 2009b)
and by promoting its association with heat shock protein 90 (Davis et al., 2006)
leading to endothelial NO production. In addition, AMPK also produces its
regulatory effects in the peripheral vasculature through vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF)-mediated endothelial angiogenesis (Nagata et al., 2003; Ouchi et al., 2005; Stahmann et
al., 2010).
Interestingly, a recent study has shown increased phosphorylation of AMPK and
eNOS in endothelial cells of cerebral arteries following severe subarachnoid
hemorrhage (Osuka et al., 2009). Thus, it is likely that AMPK causes
beneficial effects in the brain vasculature through eNOS-mediated acute
vasodilatation (Osuka et al., 2009) or VEGF-induced angiogenesis (Lopez-Lopez et al., 2007).
Post Comment
No comments