Methods of insulin administration
a. Insulin syringes and needles
Plastic disposable syringes are
available in 1-mL, 0.5-mL, and 0.3-mL sizes. The "low-dose" 0.3-mL
syringes have become increasingly popular, because many diabetics do not take
more than 30 units of insulin in a single injection except in rare instances of
extreme insulin resistance. Two lengths of needles are available: short (8 mm)
and long (12.7 mm). Long needles are preferable in obese patients to reduce
variability of insulin absorption. Ultrafine needles as small as 31 gauge
reduce the pain of injections. "Disposable" syringes may be reused
until blunting of the needle occurs (usually after three to five injections).
Sterility adequate to avoid infection with reuse appears to be maintained by
recapping syringes between uses. Cleansing the needle with alcohol may not be
desirable since it can dissolve the silicone coating and can increase the pain
of skin puncturing.
Any part of the body covered by
loose skin can be used, such as the abdomen, thighs, upper arms, flanks, and
upper buttocks. Preparation with alcohol is no longer required prior to
injection as long as the skin is clean. Rotation of sites continues to be
recommended to avoid delayed absorption when fibrosis or lipohypertrophy occurs
from repeated use of a single site. However, considerable variability of
absorption rates from different sites, particularly with exercise, may
contribute to the instability of glycemic control in certain type 1 patients if
injection sites are rotated too frequently in different areas of the body.
Consequently, it is best to limit injection sites to a single region of the
body and rotate sites within that region. The abdomen is recommended for
subcutaneous injections, since regular insulin has been shown to absorb more
rapidly from there than from other subcutaneous sites. The effect of anatomic
regions appears to be much less pronounced with the analog insulins.
b. Insulin pen injector devices
Insulin pens eliminate the need for
carrying insulin vials and syringes. Cartridges of insulin lispro, insulin
aspart, insulin glargine, regular insulin, NPH insulin, and 70% NPH/30% regular
insulin are available for reusable pens (Novo Nordisk, Becton Dickinson, and
Sanofi Aventis pens). Disposable prefilled pens are also available for insulin
lispro, NPH, 70% NPH/30% regular, 75% NPL/25% insulin lispro, and 70% insulin
aspart protamine/30% insulin aspart. Thirty-one gauge needles (5, 6, and 8 mm
long) for these pens make injections almost painless.
c. Insulin pumps
In the United States, Medtronic Mini-Med,
Animas, and Deltec Cozmo insulin infusion pumps are available for subcutaneous
delivery of insulin. These pumps are small (about the size of a pager) and very
easy to program. They offer many features, including the ability to set a
number of different basal rates throughout the 24 hours and to adjust the time
over which bolus doses are given. They also are able to detect pressure
build-up if the catheter is kinked. Improvements have also been made in the
infusion sets. The catheter connecting the insulin reservoir to the
subcutaneous cannula can be disconnected, allowing the patient to remove the
pump temporarily (e.g., for bathing). The great advantage of continuous
subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is that it allows for establishment of a
basal profile tailored to the patient. The patient therefore is able to eat
with less regard to timing because the basal insulin infusion should maintain
constant blood glucose between meals. Also the ability to adjust the basal
insulin infusion makes it easier for the patient to manage glycemic excursions
that occur with exercise.
CSII therapy is appropriate for
patients who are motivated, mechanically inclined, educated about diabetes
(diet, insulin action, treatment of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia), and
willing to monitor their blood glucose four to six times a day. Known
complications of CSII include ketoacidosis, which can occur when insulin
delivery is interrupted, and skin infections. Another disadvantage is its cost
and the time demanded of physicians and staff in initiating therapy.
d. Inhaled insulin
A novel method for delivering
preprandial insulin by inhalation has been reported. A 12-week study in type 1
patients showed that inhaled insulin is as efficacious as subcutaneously
delivered insulin without additional side effects. Patients required 300-400
units of insulin a day, since only 10% of the inhaled insulin is bioavailable.
Safety studies are in progress to determine whether long-term use affects
pulmonary tissues.
Pancreas transplantation at the time
of renal transplantation is becoming more widely accepted. Patients undergoing
simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation have an 85% chance of
pancreatic graft survival and a 92% chance of renal graft survival after 1
year. Solitary pancreatic transplantation in the absence of a need for renal
transplantation should be considered only in those rare patients who fail all
other insulin therapeutic approaches and who have frequent severe hypoglycemia
or who have life-threatening complications related to their lack of metabolic
control.
Islet cell transplantation is a minimally
invasive procedure, and investigators in Edmonton,
Canada, have
reported initial insulin independence in a small number of patients with type 1
diabetes who underwent this procedure. Using islets from multiple donors and
corticosteroid-free immunosuppression, percutaneous transhepatic portal vein
transplantation of islets was achieved in over 20 subjects. Although all of the
initial cohort was able to achieve insulin independence posttransplantation
(some for more than 2 years of follow-up), a decline in insulin secretion has
occurred over time and the subjects have again required supplemental insulin.
All patients had complete correction of severe hypoglycemic reactions, leading
to a marked improvement in overall quality of life. Even if long-term insulin
independence is demonstrated, wide application of this procedure for the
treatment of type 1 diabetes is limited by the dependence on multiple donors
and the requirement for potent long-term immunotherapy.
Post Comment
No comments