The first apocalypse: the human male has lower life expectancy before birth.
Detailed analysis of spontaneous abortions
reveals that these affect male embryos and fetuses more often. There are at least five killers which
disfavor the male embryo or fetus:
infections, errors of mitosis (of
cell division), vascular anomalies and
diseases, chromosomal aberrations, and disorders of cell migration.
The human male is inherently at greater risk than the
female for infections throughout the life span. I say "inherently" because some
cultures place such low value on the life of girls that neglect can lead to
high rates of infections for the female child.
Of course, some infections are severe
enough to cause death, and reduce life
expectancy. Why is the human male
inherently more at risk ? The reason for
this phenomenon is rather straightforward.
The immune system of the human male is less aggressive against “hosts”,
especially the truly dangerous ones that can infect and kill us, but also many of those that can cause
developmental malformations. One
exception is the class of antigens which make us allergic: boys are more often allergic than girls
because of an over-enthusiastic response of their immune system to things like
pollen, dust mites, dog and cat
dandruff, etc. Note though that this sex
difference is only temporary. After
puberty, women become three times more
at risk than men for developing allergies.
But allergy is not the immune process of greatest interest for our
purposes here. So let’s return to those
immune processes which protect us from infection. Most types of immune
processes including the proliferation and voraciousness of B and T lymphocytes
in reaction to deadly intruders are weaker in human males. Lymphocytes are circulating cells which
attack and disintegrate undesirable foreign bodies (particularly viruses and
bacteria). Some of these mature from the bone marrow (B cells) or from the
thymus (T cells). A third category of
lymphocyte is the natural killer (NK) cell circulating in the body (white blood
cells are natural killers responsible for the color of pus), and which literally envelop and devour
foreign bodies. The weaker immune
system of the male human begins to put him at a disadvantage even before he is
born, which is why male fetuses succumb
more frequently to infections
transmitted from the mother during gestation such as toxoplasmosis, rubella,
etc. The infectious agents more
likely to kill men in adulthood have
historically included agents such as tuberculosis and pneumonia. It has long been believed that steroid
hormone differences between the sexes suffice to create the cascade of
developmental events leading to the basic sex difference in the immune
system. After all, it is well documented that estrogen fans auto
immune inflammation, and is prophylactic
against infection. However, to preclude
an overly simplistic interpretation of the relation between estrogen and immune
function, I have to say this: estrogen reaches its highest concentration in
women as pregnancy advances toward parturition. However, at this same point most immune
responses are actually weaker than in women who are not pregnant. Why ?
So that the mother will not reject the foreign body (parasite) which is
her own baby ! In short, hormonal-immune relations are very
complex. There is increasing
evidence, though still tentative, to the effect that X-linked genes also play a
modulatory role in immunoregulation
-even though the most important gene complex in immunoregulation is
located on the sixth chromosome, an
autosomal chromosome supposed to be identical in the two sexes.
The mechanism,
or mechanisms responsible for the greater risk of the human male of mitotic
error is less understood. Mitosis is
nothing other than cell division. Cancer
is an error of cell division. In fact, it consists of unbridled mitosis. The young male of the human species is at
greater risk for most cancers (but not all kinds) than his female
counterpart. A recent study conducted in
Italy reviewed 90,431 cases of cancer in humans. Women had a better prognosis
for most cancer sites (overall 5-year relative survival in women 48% vs 32% in
men). Of course, it would be very difficult for men to have
higher rates of breast or ovarian cancer since men do not have these
organs. Actually, things are not quite that simple. Men have rudimentary vestigial mammary
glands, and the odd few can get breast
cancer (and Klinefelter patients, who
have gynecomastia or female-like breasts,
are more at risk than normal men).
However, in the cases of those
organs which are similar in both sexes (viscera, bone, muscle, brain,
etc.), the human male is slightly more
at risk for cancer, at all ages. Though this is an overriding general
tendency, there are some exceptions. For
example, the incidence of gastric cancer is much higher in men than in women,
and a similar sex difference is also seen in a rat experimental model of gastric
cancer. One line of investigation which
could explain the generally greater male risk for cancer is biomolecular
research into X-linked mechanisms. The
catalytic polypeptide of DNA-polymerase-alpha,
which seems to play a basic role in cell division in the entire
body, has been mapped to the X
chromosome, thus offering a tentative
mechanism for female resistance to cancer.
Finally, at least one cancer has
been linked to concentrations of a male steroid hormone. Indeed,
cancer of the prostate (a male organ) has recently been found to be
curable with a treatment involving,
among other things,
administration of Zoladex, a testosterone antagonist.
Excessive proliferation of cells in the brain is one
problem which affects male fetuses more than female. However,
insufficient cell division can be another major problem. One of the severest such problems, anencephaly,
consists of a failure of development of the last layers of brain
tissue. Anencephaly is the failure of
development of the most anterior part of the brain. It occurs very early in prenatal development
at the moment when the brain consists of a mere tube (the neural tube). This
problem is very rare, but it affects
females more often than the male fetuses.
The female to male ratio is 1.49: 1. Female newborns are also at greater
risk for an abnormally small head and brain (microcephaly). This is also a failure of growth which
usually occurs very early on in fetal brain development. Later occurring
disorders of fetal brain development are more common in the male sex. For example,
the corpus callosum is a large bundle of neurons which develops
relatively late in fetal development.
Male fetuses are more at risk for all callosal abnormalities including
holoprosencephaly (fusion of the two brain hemispheres) and callosal agenesis (failure of development
of the corpus callosum). Spina
bifida, a failure of encasement of the
spinal cord into the vertebrae (or spinal cord hernia), is also preponderant in male over female newborns.
Hydrocephaly is also more common in the male sex (2.2: 1). Some authors call
these disorders defects of “canalization” of the nervous system.
Vascular disease of blood vessels can lead to two
types of conditions which kill people:
bleeding (hemorrhage) and obstruction (thrombosis or embolus). Heart disease is another vascular
condition. All three forms affect the
human male more than the human female.
Because it is rightly known that an unhealthy life style (alcohol,
smoking, heart disease, fatty diet, sedentarism, stress) can increase risk for
heart (especially the strongly male prevalent coronary atherosclerosis) and
other vascular diseases, it has been
argued that women will catch up with men
-as they seem to be doing as a direct function of the decreasing sex
difference in prevalence of smoking.
This well founded observation does not however explain the whole
story. The male fetus and child are
particularly at greater risk for vascular disease, a sex difference difficult to attribute to
life style. In other words, there is a biologically inherent weakness in
the male vascular system in the human species.
Of course, it is easy to explain why there would be more
gonosomal aberrations in the male sex.
The male is not protected by lyonization (see chapter 3 if you have
forgotten the explanation of this mechanism).
However, the human male is
slightly more at risk for autosomal aberrations as well ! This is truly a remarkable sex
difference. Why in heaven's name would
there be significantly more boys with Down's syndrome (trisomy 21) than girls ?
It has now been found in several investigations that whereas female
humans are more susceptible to errors occurring at the moment where the future
mother's egg (ovum) is dividing up its chromosomes into half the full set
(meiosis), human males are also in
addition to that, more at risk for such an error occurring in the future
father's sperm. This sex difference
seems to be most true of one of the most common chromosomal aberrations, trisomy-21 or Down's syndrome. It is still not known why this paternal
legacy is handed down so much more often to the male offspring, nor what is special in this respect about the
21st chromosome. Curiously, I have come across many reports of an
exception to the overall trend disfavoring males: the female sex has been reported to be at
greater risk for Edward's syndrome
(trisomy 18). I have not been able to
find much scientific explanation of this phenomenon, but it seems that more female zygotes with
major chromosomal abnormalities (trisomy 13 or Patau's syndrome, trisomy 18 or Edward's syndrome) actually
survive to term. So in fact, the male sex is probably truly more at risk
for all the autosomal trisomies.
Overall, the most extensive
investigations of chromosomal aberrations (trisomies, monosomies, structural
abnormalities such as partial deletions) of very large cohorts have found that
the male sex is somewhere between 1.2 and 1.3 times more at risk.
Neuronal migration in the brain, like neuronal
proliferation (cell division or mitosis), is a phenomenon of prenatal
development. Neurons are most often
born in a central area of the brain called the periventricular area. That is where the mother neurons divide and
multiply (mitosis), a process reaching near-completion around the
fourteenth week after conception. I cannot resist mentioning that this process
of mitosis becomes so intense that at the high point of the process, the fetus's neurons are multiplying by a
factor of 5,000 a second ! Shortly after
they are born, many things happen to the
daughter neurons. They migrate, differentiate, interconnect, form systems, etc. Given the rapid rate at which all of these
processes occur in fetal development, is
it any wonder that errors may sometimes occur ? One of the errors that does occur is in the
migration of the daughter neurons to the gray area of the brain, the intelligent part, called the cortex. Neuronal migration is guided by complex
chemical processes diffusely (and not so diffusely) occurring in the
brain. Newborn neurons are attracted to
specific mature neurons (targets) with which they are destined to make contact
and form synapses. A diversity of molecules located on the targets (cell
adhesion molecules) and around the targets (hormones, immune processes, etc.) also play a
role. Most of the process of neuronal
migration is complete by the time of birth.
Sometimes, cell migration is off
by a whole cortical layer. One such
syndrome is called double cortex, and
is characterized by extra layers of cells in the cortex, beyond the usual six. Incidentally,
the double cortex syndrome is very rare,
and the few cases reported in the medical literature that I have
consulted were all of the female sex, for reasons that remain, I think, completely
unknown. However, several more common syndromes due to errors
of neuron migration are more prevalent in the male sex. One disorder of neuronal migration, which is
less dramatic than double cortex, causes dyslexia. During fetal development, pockets of neurons
get installed here and there in inappropriate layers of cortex, and these can be accompanied by
micro-vascular anomalies as well. These
migrational anomalies are called ectopias.
They are characteristic of all developmental dyslexics which have been
studied post mortem. Dyslexia is a
male-prevalent disorder. It is not clear
to which extent the male sex is at risk for errors of cell migration in the
brain in other developmental disorders.
Many developmental disorders have not been systematically explored with
autopsy material. More severe disorders
of neuronal organization may involve multiple errors of cell division as well
as migration. Trigonocephaly is a
deformation of the cranium and brain characterized by a triangular
forehead. This condition was studied in
a pedigree and was found in six relatives through three generations of one
family. In addition to the trigonocephaly,
the carriers had minor ear, vertebral, and genital abnormalities, mild
microcephaly, and minor eye abnormalities.
In this family, trigonocephaly was an autosomal dominant trait. The
ratio of affected males to affected females was 5 to 1. Porencephaly is a major aplasia (localized
failure of development of the brain). One study investigated porencephaly in 2793
consecutive autopsies of children aged up to 18 years. There were 12 cases of porencephaly,
accounting for 0.43% of the autopsy material, and 5.2% of all anomalies of the
central nervous system in this age group. The anomaly was twice as frequent in
boys than girls.
An intact brain requires not only proper emplacement
of neurons, but also of all the other
tissues forming the head, including bone.
It is easy to detect errors of bone development because the cranium can
be assessed directly in a living newborn.
One of the disorders of development of the cranium is craniostosis, inappropriate timing of the fusion of the
bone plates forming the head. This
results in deformities of the head and of the underlying brain. And indeed,
boys are slightly more frequently victims of this developmental disorder
than are girls.
Post Comment
No comments