Comparisons of Predicted and Observed AUCs for Both Acrylamide and Glycidamide Based on Hemoglobin Adduct Data--Implications for Model Parameter Adjustments and Model Behavior, Using the Original Kirman et al. (2003) Set of Partition Coefficients
The basic dose
response behavior of a variety of parameters in 24 hour simulations of the
original Kirman et al. model is shown in Table 2-3. It can be seen that this base model predicts
that at low doses about 38% of the acrylamide is transformed to glycidamide. As doses are increased, metabolic saturation
is approached and the percent conversion to glycidamide declines to about 23%
at 50 mg/kg—less than the 32.6% fraction observed in the urinary metabolite
output in the Sumner et al. (1992).
Also, the original Kirman et al. (2003) model predicts that the low dose
half lives for acrylamide and glycidamide are about 1.35 and slightly over 2
hours, respectively. The last column of
Table 2-3 also indicates that there is a modest degree of nonlinearity in the
ratio of internal glycidamide AUC/external acrylamide dose in the 0.5 – 3 mg/kg
dose range used for the chronic rat bioassay experiments.
Table 2-4 compares the expectations
under the original Kirman et al. (2003) model with the adduct-based AUC observations
presented in Table 2-2. It can be seen
that although the model conforms reasonably to the Bergmark et al. (1991)
observations for the acrylamide AUC, there is an approximately 2-fold under
prediction of the acrylamide AUCs derived from the Fennell and Sumner
hemoglobin-valine adduct observations.
The discrepancies between predictions and observations for the
adduct-based glycidamide AUCs are much more profound. The under- predictions of
glycidamide AUCs are 3-7 fold for the Bergmark et al. (1991) adduct
observations, and on the order of 10-fold or slightly more for the observations
of Fennell and Sumner at low doses.
We adjusted the model in a series of
steps. We will describe the steps and
associated reasoning, but we will not document all of the intermediate results
here for the sake of brevity.
·
First, we removed the multiplier of 3.2 from the
calculation of partition coefficients for glycidamide; substituting 1. This directly increased the ratio of
glycidamide in the blood relative to the tissues; and hence increased the AUC
of glycidamide while making relatively modest changes in other aspects of model
behavior.
·
The under prediction of acrylamide AUC by the
model could only be rectified by reducing the rate of processing of acrylamide
by the model. The principal way we found
to accommodate this without exacerbating the under prediction of glycidamide
AUC was to reduce the rates of all non-P450 modes of acrylamide
destruction—e.g. the glutathione transferase reaction and all the nonspecific
reactions of acrylamide in the tissues.
In the final calibrated model (Table 2-5; presented in the same format
as was used for the original model in Table 2-1), these non-P450 rates of
reaction of acrylamide are reduced to approximately one quarter of their
baseline values in the original Kirman et al. model. This has the effect of increasing the
proportion of acrylamide that is processed to glycidamide via P450 oxidation.
·
A more modest downward adjustment of 0.7 fold
was made to both the Vmax and the Km for the P450-mediated metabolism of
acrylamide to reduce the apparent dose dependence of the departures of
predicted vs. observed acrylamide AUCs.
Changing both Vmax and Km in
parallel has the effect of decreasing the metabolism of acrylamide at high doses
while leaving metabolism rates relatively unchanged at low doses.
·
Finally, to bring the model-“predicted”
glycidamide AUCs into alignment with the observations, the rates of glycidamide
metabolism by all routes were reduced to half their baseline values; increasing
the glycidamide half-life.
The combined results
of these changes for the dose response behavior various model parameters are
shown in Table 2-6 (which is parallel to Table 2-3). It can be seen that the low dose 1-2 hour
half life of acrylamide has been increased from 1.35 to 2.46 hours (this
slightly overstates the half life at later time points); the low dose half life
of glycidamide has been increased from
about 2.1 hours to 3.8 hours and the low dose fraction of acrylamide processed
via the glycidamide pathway has been increased from 39% to about 72%. At 50 ppm, where the urinary metabolite data
of Sumner et al. (1992) indicate a minimum of 34% must be processed by non-P450
pathways to soluble glutathione-derived metabolites, the model results show an
expectation that 32.7% is processed by direct reaction with glutathione.
Alternative model calibrations are
probably possible that would reduce the fraction of acrylamide that is
processed by the P450 pathway at low doses.
However in order to achieve compatibility with the glycidamide adduct
data, such recalibrations would require further reduction in the metabolism
rate of glycidamide—lengthening the internal half life of glycidamide in the
system. Choosing the calibration we have
makes the smallest feasible modifications to the Kirman et al. rate constants
for glycidamide metabolism. This
probably does not greatly affect the ultimate balance of metabolic processing
derived for our human model. As
described in Section 3 below, the human model requires further reductions in
the non-P450 rates of metabolism of acrylamide in order to both conform to the
observation of relatively higher acrylamide AUC per external dose in humans
compared to rats, while still generating sufficient amounts of glycidamide to
produce the amounts of glycidamide adducts per unit dose that were observed in
the human subjects.
The resulting fits to the Fennel/Sumner
adduct based rat AUC data are reasonable although not ideal (Table 2-7) Except
for the modest under prediction of the acrylamide AUC at the lowest dose used
in the Fennell and Friedman (2004) dataset,
the remaining estimates do not depart by more than might be expected
from the inherent variability of experimental results of this type.
Post Comment
No comments