Drug Discovery and Development Today
Drug discovery today
is a very complex, competitive, delicate and risky process. This is partly
because the pharmaceutical industry is the epitome of the ‘winner-takes-all’
philosophy where the first company to patent a drug gets exclusive rights for
its use for many years - a passage way to huge financial gains (Duggan et al, 2000). The runner-up gets
absolutely nothing (Duggan et al,
2000). The drug
discovery, development and approvals process, from conception to market is
summarized in
Drug companies continuously analyze thousands of
compounds, seeking ones of therapeutic value (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003). Drug
testing begins at the preclinical stage (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003; Wierenga
& Eaton, 2004). In this phase, the manufacturer completes laboratory and
animal studies of the compound, to show biological activity against the targeted
disease and to verify the safety of the compound (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003;
Wierenga & Eaton, 2004). The preclinical testing phase lasts anywhere from
three to seven years (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004).
Of five thousand compounds tested, approximately five will appear promising
enough to induce the company to file an Investigational New Drug Application
(IND) (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003; PhRMA, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004).
The IND shows results of previous experiments, how, where and by whom the new
studies will be conducted; the chemical structure of the compound; how it is
thought to work in the body; any toxic effects found in the animal studies; and
how the compound is manufactured (Wierenga & Eaton, 2004). If the FDA
approves the IND,
an Institutional Review Board (IRB) is also required to give its approval
before the manufacturer can be permitted to begin the first phase of
development (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004). The FDA
strictly monitors the membership of the IRB to ensure that it is composed of
“at least five members including at least one scientific member, one
nonscientific member, at least one person not affiliated with the research
institution, no members with conflicts of interests, both genders if at all
possible, and so forth” (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003). The IND stage consists of three phases:
Phase I
In phase I, the pharmaceutical companies conduct
clinical trials using anywhere from twenty to a hundred healthy volunteers to
determine the drug's basic properties and safety in humans (Pratap, 2004). This
test stage can last for one to two years (PhRMA, 2003).
Phase II
In phase II, efficacy trials begin as the drug is
administered to several hundred volunteer patients (Pratap, 2004). In this
phase, the patients are given the drug to evaluate how effective it is against
the observed signs and symptoms of the disease (Pratap, 2004). The possible
side effects are also evaluated (Pratap, 2004). At the end of phase II, the
manufacturer meets with the FDA to discuss the development process, continued
human testing, any concerns the FDA may have, and the protocols for phase III,
which is usually the most extensive and most expensive part of drug development
(Klein & Tabarrok, 2003).
Phase III
Phase III
testing involves one to several thousand patient volunteers and is by far the
most detailed, time consuming and expensive clinical trial phase (Klein &
Tabarrok, 2003; PhRMA, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004). In this phase, the
drug is administered to patients to get more information on its effectiveness,
safety, optimal dosage and rare side effects (Pratap, 2004; Wierenga &
Eaton, 2004). This essentially is a risk-benefit analysis that allows the FDA to
decide on the overall benefit of a drug, measured against the observed risks and
side effects (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003).
Once Phase III is complete, the manufacturer analyzes all of the data and files a New Drug Application (NDA) with FDA if the data successfully demonstrate safety and effectiveness (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004). Mahlich (2001) describes a Phase IV where the new drug, having been successfully registered is continuously monitored “to collect and evaluate information on rare side-effects, to quantify the therapeutic risks and to determine possible new areas of indication”.
Once Phase III is complete, the manufacturer analyzes all of the data and files a New Drug Application (NDA) with FDA if the data successfully demonstrate safety and effectiveness (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004). Mahlich (2001) describes a Phase IV where the new drug, having been successfully registered is continuously monitored “to collect and evaluate information on rare side-effects, to quantify the therapeutic risks and to determine possible new areas of indication”.
During the IND phases (Phases I –
III) there are a few accommodations that can be allowed the drug manufacturers.
The manufacturer can receive an “accelerated development” status, to allow for
the treatment of patients with “life-threatening or seriously debilitating
conditions, for which no other drug treatment exists”, or a “treatment IND” status to allow for
treatment of patients with “immediately life-threatening” conditions (Klein
& Tabarrok, 2003). The NDA must contain all of the scientific information
that the company has gathered and typically run 100,000 pages or more (Wierenga
& Eaton, 2004). Review of the NDA typically lasts one to two years,
bringing total drug development and approval (that is, the IND and NDA stages) to approximately nine
years (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003). During the NDA stage, the FDA consults
advisory committees made of experts to obtain a broader range of advice on drug
safety, effectiveness, and labeling (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003). Once
approved, the drug may be marketed with FDA regulated labeling (Klein &
Tabarrok, 2003). The FDA also gathers safety information as the drug is used
and adverse events are reported, and it will occasionally request changes in
labeling or will submit press releases as new contraindications arise (Klein
& Tabarrok, 2003). If adverse events appear to be systematic and serious,
the FDA may withdraw a product from the market (Klein & Tabarrok, 2003).
For every 5,000
or so compounds tested, approximately five will appear promising enough to file
an IND (Klein
& Tabarrok, 2003; PhRMA, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004). Of those five,
approximately one will be approved by the FDA and make it to market (Klein
& Tabarrok, 2003; PhRMA, 2003; Wierenga & Eaton, 2004).
For a detailed discussion of the drug development
process, please refer to the FDA handbook on this subject
(http://www.fda.gov/cder/handbook/develop.htm).
Post Comment
No comments