Experimental neuropsychology approaches to gender differences in cerebral dominance.
Experimental psychologists have devised two
basic techniques for studying hemispheric dominance inexpensively in normal
subjects without invasive or painful manipulations. The first of these techniques is called
dichotic listening. Dichotic listening
literally (etymologically) means listening to stimuli presented simultaneously
to each ear -through headphones. The
left ear sends 80% of its nerve fibers to the right hemisphere and 20% to the
left. The left ear sends 80% of its
fibers to the right hemisphere and 20% to the left. I reviewed the scientific literature on
gender differences in normal people in ear asymmetries in dichotic
listening. I found 33 relevant
reports. Most of the studies used verbal
stimuli, which always produce a slight
average right ear advantage, surely due
to the left hemisphere's specialization for processing language. About a third of the studies were on
children. Twenty of the studies
reported that boys or men had a greater right ear advantage, only one study
found women to have a greater right ear advantage, and the rest found no difference. This very strongly suggests that with respect
to this type of brain activity, there is
a sex difference -though it is of a small magnitude. The male sex seems to be more hemispherically
functionally lateralized. Boys and men
use their left hemisphere more exclusively to process verbal stimuli under
these (very artificial) experimental conditions. They also seem to use their right hemisphere
more exclusively to process non-verbal stimuli.
Several studies have shown that dichotic listening is
very much dependent upon cognitive style.
For example, the right ear
advantage in verbal dichotic listening tasks has been shown to increase
significantly as a function of head turning during the task, field independence (the ability to visually
disembed jumbled figures), self-reported
strategy (ex: non-verbal for visual processing of geometrical forms), and so on.
All of these characteristics or strategies, favoring ear advantages,
were found to be more typical of men than women. At this point, what is needed is a positron emission
tomography study demonstrating that ear advantages really do reflect greater
metabolic engagement of the supposedly specialized hemisphere in men.
The second major technique of experimental
neuropsychology is tachistoscopy.
Tachistoscopy literally (etymologically) means viewing of very brief
stimuli. The technique allows researchers
to present a stimulus to the right or left of a centrally fixated point for a
few milliseconds (thousandths of a second).
The visual pathway of the brain is such that the right visual field
projects to the left hemisphere and the left field to the right hemisphere. I reviewed the scientific literature for
reports of gender differences in field asymmetries (or absence of such gender
effects). Most of these experiments
consisted of spatial discrimination tasks.
Only a few studies investigated children
-probably because it is difficult to get young children to reliably
fixate a central point during such a task.
I found 25 such reports. Fifteen
concluded to more field asymmetry in boys or men, only one report found more field
asymmetry in women, and the rest found no gender difference. It seems that boys and men are more
hemispherically functionally lateralized in this type of brain processing as
well. This gender difference seems
particularly credible for spatial processing,
but the less numerous studies including verbal discrimination tasks also
found that men were more hemispherically functionally lateralized.
The exploitation of the tachistoscopic technique for
supporting inferences about sex differences in brain organization is also
complicated by matters of cognitive style.
A group of Italian neuropsychologists published a most eloquent
demonstration of this several years ago.
They were interested in determining whether there was a sex difference
in hemispheric dominance on a task of visual discrimination. They designed a study requiring subjects to
determine whether two stimuli (pictures) in a given visual field were identical
or different. The stimuli
resembled letters. Women obtained a right field advantage
(typically inferred to involve the left hemisphere) and men obtained a left field advantage (typically inferred to involve the right
hemisphere). It turns out that the
field effects were more due to the way in which men and women carried out the
task, probably more than to any inherent differences in brain hemispheres. The
researchers observed that the women spontaneously tended to use a “verbal”
strategy and the men a “visual” strategy.
In a subsequent experiment, irrespective of gender, subjects who were
instructed to use a verbal strategy consisting of viewing the pictures as
alphabetical letters got a right field advantage. Accordingly,
subjects got a left field advantage,
whether they were men or women,
when they used a non-verbal
"perceptual" strategy. In a
task like this one, a non-verbal
perceptual strategy is more efficient,
giving to men not only a field effect but also an overall performance
advantage in the first experiment. But
on other tasks, women's preference
(often noted and documented
-including in navigational situations and mazes as we saw in the
previous section) for more verbal cognitive problem-solving strategies give them the advantage. These matters of cognitive style can give a
false impression of superiority of one sex over the other. They can also lead researchers who are too
naïve into believing in the existence of brain differences and even hemispheric
asymmetries which don't exist. In my own
extensive research in the domain of tachistoscopic approaches to
neuropsychology I have often obtained complex interactions involving
gender -in the absence of main
effects, suggesting to me that
cognitive styles are probably at work -in addition to basic intrinsic
differences in hemispheric specialization.
Post Comment
No comments