HEALTH FINANCING ISSUES
Public expenditure levels
Fair financing of the costs
of health care is an issue in equity and it has two aspects how much is spent by Government on publicly funded health care
and on what aspects? And secondly how huge does the burden of treatment fall on the poor seeking health care?
Health spending in India at 6% of GDP is
among the highest levels estimated for developing countries. In per capita
terms it is higher than in China Indonesia and most African countries but lower
than in Thailand. Even on PPP $ terms
India has been a relatively high spender information sheets based on reporting
from a network associating private doctors also as has been done successfully
at CMC Vellore in their rural health projects or by the Khoj projects of the
Voluntary Health Association of India. It is only through such community based
approach that revitalization of indigenous medicines can be done and people
trained in self care and accept responsibility for their own health.
PHC approach was also
intended to test the extent to which non-doctor based healthcare was feasible
through effective down staging of the
delivery of simpler aspects of a care as is done in several
countries through nurse practitioners and physician assistants, ANMs; physician
assistants etc can each get trained and recognized to work in allotted areas
under referral/supervision of doctors.
This may indeed be more acceptable to the medical profession than the
draft NHP proposal to restart licentiates in medicine as in the thirties and
give them shorter periods of training to serve rural areas. Such a licentiate
system cannot now be recalled against the profession's opposition nor would
people accept two level services.
Finally it is important 10 noie some dangers inherem m arrangemenis
itiai promote delivery systems substantially outside government channel either
through NGOs or through registered societies at State and district levels.
Clearly this may by a better approach than leaving it to the market and welcome
as path breaking of innovative efforts as a precursor to launching a public
program. But as a long run delivery mechanism it is neither practical nor
sustainable as such arrangements tend to bypass government under our
constitutional scheme of parliamentary responsibility and would also cut into
the potential of panchayatraj institutions. Each major disease control program
has now got a separate society at state and district levels often as part of
access to foreign aid. What is lost is the principle of parliamentary
accountability over the flow of funds that arise out of voted budgets and
international agreements to which Government is a party and answerable to
parliament. Like campaign modes and vertical interventions, the registered
society approach would weaken the long-term commitment and integrity of public
health care systems.
Post Comment
No comments