GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS
GDM is defined as carbohydrate intolerance of variable
severity that is first diagnosed during pregnancy (4).
3.1 Epidemiology of GDM:
The occurrence of GDM parallels the prevalence of type
2 diabetes in a given population, both of which having been rising sharply
during recent years. The prevalence of GDM, and the occurrence of related
complications, depends upon the definition of normal glucose values during
gestation (20). The estimated incidence of GDM in Europe
ranges from 8% to 10%. That means that of the 5,000,000 women who give birth
each year, some 400,000 to 500,000 suffer from diabetes during the course of
pregnancy.
3.2 Fetal and Maternal Implications:
GDM
is associated with a higher incidence of maternal morbidity - cesarean
deliveries, post partum type 2 diabetes; and perinatal/neonatal morbidity -
macrosomia, birth injury, shoulder dystocia, hypoglycemia, polycythemia and
bilirubinemia. Long term sequela of in utero exposure to hyperglycemia may
include a higher risk for obesity and diabetes later in life. Table 3 lists
the implications of GDM for mother and fetus/baby (11-19).
Table 3: Risk to mother
|
1.
Polyhydramnios
2.
Hypertensive diseases
3.
Recurrent genital and urinary tract infections
4.
Traumatic labour
5.
Instrumental delivery or caesarean section
6.
Full blown diabetes in the future
|
3.3 Diagnosis:
The diagnostic criteria for GDM were
first published more than 40 years ago, in pivotal research conducted by
O’sullivan and Mahan (56). These criteria were established using
non-pregnancy values, and were designed to predict the future occurrence of
maternal type 2 diabetes. The classification, diagnosis, and treatment of GDM
have been based on the recommendations of the International Workshop-Conference
on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (21). As of 2007, five such international
meetings had been held and their recommendations were adopted by major medical
institutions in Europe and America (American College of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, American Diabetes Association, European Association for the Study
of Diabetes, World Health Organization). These still widely used criteria, are
controversial mainly because they lack correlation to outcome, be it maternal
or perinatal. The other widely used
criteria are those of the World Health Organization. These criteria are those used to classify
impaired glucose tolerance, again established for a non-pregnant population (57).
To answer some of the above mentioned
controversies, the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study (HAPO) was
planned and executed (23-25). It was meant to set the evidence based
criteria for diagnosis and classification of GDM, to be based upon the
correlation between glycemic levels and perinatal outcome. The participating
teams in the study included 15 medical centers,
in 9 different countries. Pregnant women at a gestational age closely as
possible to 28 weeks (range was 24-32 weeks) were tested for fasting plasma
glucose, followed by a 75
gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Additional
blood samples were collected 1 and 2 hours post glucose intake. Also, a sample
for random plasma glucose was collected at 34-37 weeks of gestation, to
identify late onset diabetes. The caregivers and the participating women were
blinded to the results unless: fasting plasma glucose exceeded 105 mg/dL (5.8
mmol/L), 2-hour OGTT plasma glucose exceeded 200mg/dl (11.1 mmol/L), random
plasma glucose was equal or greater than 160mg/dl (8.9 mmol/L) or if any
glucose value was below 45mg/dl (2.5 mmol/L). Cord blood was collected at
delivery for measurement of glucose and C-peptide (as a surrogate marker for
plasma insulin levels). Prenatal care, timing and mode of delivery and post
natal follow up were practiced according to standard care guidelines, for each
of participating center. A total of 23,316 women completed the course of the
study, not being lost to follow up, and remaining with their data blinded. The
results of the HAPO study demonstrate an association between increasing levels
of fasting, 1-hour and 2-hour plasma glucose post a 75g OGTT, to the 4 primary
endpoints of the study: birth weight above the 90th percentile, cord
blood serum C-peptide level above the 90th percentile, primary cesarean
delivery and clinical neonatal hypoglycemia. Positive correlations were also
found between increasing plasma glucose levels to the five secondary outcomes:
premature delivery, shoulder dystocia or birth injury, intensive neonatal care
admission, hyperbilirubinemia and pre-eclampsia. The HAPO study therefore
demonstrates that fasting glucose levels and post 75g OGTT are correlated to
maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes and this is essentially in a linear
manner. There seems to be no apparent threshold, but rather a continuum of
glucose levels. These results provided the evidence base for developing perinatal
outcome based standards to diagnose and classify GDM. The International
Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) has published new recommendations
for the diagnosis of GDM.
3.4 IADPSG Recommendations
The overall strategy recommended by the
IADPSG Consensus Panel for detection and diagnosis of hyperglycemic disorders
in pregnancy is summarized in Table 4. Thresholds
for diagnosis of overt diabetes during pregnancy are summerized in Table 5, and
for GDM diagnosis in table 6. The novel approach in the IADPSG suggested
criteria is that overt diabetes can also be diagnosed during pregnancy, and
that the criteria are evidence based on the HAPO study results.
At the first prenatal visit, all or
only high-risk women should undergo testing of fasting plasma glucose (FPG),
hemoglobin A1C, or random plasma glucose (RPG), based on the background
frequency of abnormal glucose metabolism in the population and on local
circumstances. Criteria for low risk include: Absence of
diabetes in first-degree relatives, Age <25 years, Normal pre-pregnancy
weight, No history of poor carbohydrate metabolism, No history of adverse pregnancy
outcome . Criteria for high risk women for diabetes include: Pre-pregnancy
obesity, Family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, GDM in a past pregnancy
and Known carbohydrate intolerance or glycosuria. To
diagnose GDM at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation, a 2-hour, 75-g OGTT should be
performed after overnight fast on all women not previously found to have overt
diabetes or GDM during testing earlier in this pregnancy. All women diagnosed
with GDM or overt diabetes during pregnancy should undergo postpartum glucose
testing.
Table 4:
Strategy for the detection and diagnosis of hyperglycemia disorder in
pregnancy
|
First
Prenatal Visit
|
Measure
Fasting Plasma Glucose, Hemoglobin A1C or Random Plasma Glucose, on all or
only high risk women:
If results indicate overt diabetes as
per table 5 à Pre-existing
diabetes
If results not diagnostic of overt
diabetes as per table 5 and fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.1mmol/L (92mg/dl)
but < 7.0 mmol/L (126mg/dl) à GDM
If results not diagnostic of overt
diabetes as per table 5 and fasting plasma glucose < 5.1mmol/L
(92mg/dl)
à test for GDM
from 24-28 weeks with a 75g OGTT
|
24-28 weeks
of gestation
|
Perform a 75g
OGTT on all women not previously diagnosed with overt diabetes or GDM:
If fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dl) à Pre-existing
diabetes
If one or more values equals or
exceeds thresholds as per table 6 à GDM
If all values less than thresholds
indicated as per table 6 à Normal
|
Table 5:
Threshold Values for diagnosis of Overt diabetes in pregnancy
|
|||
Measure of
Glycemia
|
Threshold
|
Remarks
|
|
Fasting
Plasma Glucose
|
≥ 7.0 mmol/L
|
≥ 126 mg/dl
|
|
Hemoglobin
A1C
|
≥ 6.5%
|
DCCT/UKPDS
Standardized
|
|
Random Plasma
Glucose
|
≥ 11.1 mmol/L
|
≥ 200 mg/dl
|
If a random
plasma glucose is the initial measure of glycemia, the tentative diagnosis of
overt diabetes in pregnancy should be confirmed by fasting plasma glucose or hemoglobin A1C
|
Table 6:
Threshold Values for diagnosis of GDM
|
||
Glucose
Measure
|
Glucose
Threshold
|
|
Mmol/L
|
mg/dl
|
|
Fasting
Plasma Glucose
|
5.1
|
92
|
1 Hour Post
75g OGTT
|
10.0
|
180
|
1 Hour Post
75g OGTT
|
8.5
|
153
|
3.5 Treatment:
Researchers
agree that when GDM is diagnosed early and treated properly, the risk of
intrauterine fetal death decreases to levels matching those of the general
population. Fetal morbidity is lower in affected women maintained under optimal
glucose control than in women who are not. The major cause of perinatal
morbidity in GDM is large-for-gestational-age fetus, which leads to a high rate
of caesarean section and injury to both mother and child during delivery.
Repeated
ultrasonographic scans to assess fetal weight and detect asymmetric growth will
improve the ability of the physician to identify pregnancies at risk of
macrosomia in order to focus treatment.
The optimal
time of delivery and need to induce labour are still controversial.
Nevertheless, the presence of macrosomia is clearly harmful to both fetus and
mother (i.e., increases rate of caesarean section). Other important
considerations are hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, and hypocalcaemia. The
severity of these findings depends on the gestational age at birth and other metabolic
parameters.
GDM with onset
in late pregnancy does not carry an increased risk of congenital anomalies.
However, GDM detected in the first trimester, like PreDM, may be associated
with an increased incidence of fetal developmental abnormalities. Therefore,
these patients should be managed like those with pre-existing diabetes mellitus
as far as auxiliary tests (ultrasonography, fetal echography) are concerned.
3.5.1 Goals of treatment - The main goals of treatment of GDM are to prevent
adverse effects to mother and infant. Normalization of glucose levels is a
proven factor in the attainment of this goal. In addition, postprandial glucose
levels are more closely associated with macrosomia than fasting levels. There
are as yet no controlled studies establishing the optimal blood glucose level
for prevention of increased fetal risk. Table 7 shows the values known to be
related to a similar risk in the general population (22-25).
Table 7: Goals of treatment |
||
Fasting
|
95 mg/dl
|
5.3 mmol/l
|
1 hr after meal
|
140 mg/dl
|
7.8 mmol/l
|
2 hr after meal
|
120 mg/dl
|
6.7 mmol/l
|
3.5.2 Diet - Women with GDM
must follow an individually tailored diet prepared by a dietician (26-34)
§
Nutritional advise should account for personal habits
and preferences, body weight, type and rate of physical activity, blood glucose
level, ketone level, and should consider timings and type of insulin (if
necessary). The diet must deliver the minimum daily nutritional requirements
for all pregnant women.
§
The caloric intake must be compatible with the state
of pregnancy and ensure the proper weight gain according to the patient’s ideal
weight before and during pregnancy. Recommended daily caloric intake is
presented in table 8.
§
The recommended weight gain during pregnancy is 7 kg for women who were
overweight before pregnancy (BMI >29kg/m2) and up to 18 kg in women who were
underweight before pregnancy (BMI<19.8kg/m2).
§
In women with known obesity before pregnancy
(BMI>30kg/m2), the number of calories may be decreased to 30% of
recommended values. This limitation must be done carefully by an experienced
professional in the field, with close surveillance by urine testing for
ketonuria. There is evidence indicating that this restriction can decrease
blood glucose and triglyceride levels.
§ The distribution
of caloric intake should be 35-40% carbohydrates (complex carbohydrates are
recommended), 20-25% protein, and 35-40% fat (10% polyunsaturated). In general,
blood glucose levels can be well controlled by setting the correct amount of
carbohydrates for every meal. An
example is presented in Table 9.
§
The effect of the diet should be followed by
postprandial SMBG, and changes made accordingly.
§
Sometimes, carbohydrates need to be decreased at
breakfast and decreased at dinner.
§
Special attention should be directed to women who
decrease their carbohydrate intake because of poor information or misdirected
fear.
§
Urine ketones should be monitored to prevent
starvation ketosis.
§
Artificial sweeteners may be used in moderation.
Table 8: Recommended
daily caloric intake
|
|
Body mass
index (kg/m2)
|
Caloric
intake/kg body weight
|
<19.8
|
35-40
|
19.8-29
|
30-32
|
>29
|
24-25
|
Table 9: Daily distribution of carbohydrates |
||
Hour |
Meal |
% of total daily carbohydrates |
8:00
|
Breakfast
|
10
|
10:30
|
Mid-morning
|
5
|
13:00
|
Lunch-time
|
30
|
15:00
|
Early
Mid-afternoon
|
10
|
17:00
|
Late
Mid-afternoon
|
5
|
20:00
|
Dinner
|
30
|
23:00
|
Night
snack
|
10
|
3.5.3 Glyburide
- Glyburide (Glybenclamide, Gluben) may be used as drug
therpay in GDM. It should be considered in women who failed to achieve glycemic
control following a two week trial of diet. Accumilated evidence suggest that
glyburide is both safe and effective during pregnancy. The following criteia
sugges a lower chance of achieving appripriate metabolic control with
glyburide, thus, in these cases insulin should be considered as the first line
medical therapy: Diagnosis of hyperglycemia in pregnancy prior to 25 weeks,
Need for medical therapy beyond 30 weeks, Fasting glucose levels >110mg/dl,
1hr post prandial glucose >140mg/dl and pregnancy weight gain >12Kg. Glyburide
should be started on a dosage of 2.5mg/d, with dosage elevated according to
glycemic control every 4-5 days, to a maximal dose of 20mg/d.
3.5.4 Insulin - When the glucose level cannot be maintained within recommended limits by
diet alone and/or glyburide treatment, insulin treatment is required. There is no
evidence supporting the advantages of any one
dosage over another. Insulin programs should be individualized on a
case-by-case basis (35-40)
§ Human insulin is recommended; the dosage schedule is dictated by the
circadian glycemic profile.
§ Rapid-acting insulin analogues can improve glycemic levels, Although
available data does not clearly find insulin lispro or insulin aspart to be
superior to regular insulin in pregnant women in terms of glycemic control and
risk of hypoglycemia, it appears they are as safe and as efficacious as regular
insulin for the management of GDM.
§ Recently, a large randomized controlled trial comparing insulin detemir
with long-acting human insulin has been published, and was found to be safe and
effective as long acting insulin during pregnancy. Paucity of data exists on
insulin glargine during pregnancy, adn although it appears to be safe and well
tolerated, data is of low quality and fear of terategonicity has not been
clearly removed.
§
Hyperglycaemia
and hypoglycaemia should be prevented during delivery. Insulin should be
given only if glucose levels rise above the maximum range. Clinicians should
ensure an appropriate and balanced glucose-insulin supply during delivery,
whether spontaneous or by caesarean section.
3.6 Labour and Delivery:
Labour and
delivery is aimed to occur at term, or otherwise if indicated by maternal or fetal
compromise. Normal
vaginal delivery is preferred, but a liberal approach to operative delivery
(caesarean sections) is used when estimated fetal weight is above 4,000 g. Assessment of fetal
lung maturity is performed only when delivery is induced before the 38th week. Fetal
weight is estimated sonographically at 38 weeks and the decision regarding
timing and mode of delivery is undertaken (41-44).
3.7 Long-Term Effects and Postnatal Care:
Women with GDM
are at risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, and sometimes type 1, after
pregnancy, depending on their age at diagnosis of GDM, glucose level on the
first postpartum assessment, beta cell function, weight, and another pregnancy.
All In women in whom glucose intolerance was diagnosed during pregnancy, the
glycaemic status should be re-evaluated at 6-12 weeks after delivery with a 75 g glucose load (45-46). Diagnosis is
based on the currently recommended criteria, as presented in table 10. Women
who do not have diabetes according to these definitions should undergo repeated
OGTT once yearly. Women who had GDM should be advised to maintain a healthy
life-style with regular exercise and normal body weight for their habits and to
seek consultation before their next pregnancy.
Table 10. Reclassification of
disease after diabetic pregnancy by 75 g OGTT
|
||
Diagnosis |
Fasting blood glucose
|
2 hr blood glucose
|
Normal values
|
<110 mg/dl (<6.1 mmol/l)
|
<140 mg/dl (<7.8 mmol/l)
|
Interim state
|
110-125 mg/dl (6.1 - 7.0 mmol/l)
|
140-199 mg/dl (7.8 - 11.0 mmol/l)
|
Diabetes
|
>126 mg/dl on two tests (>7.0
mmol/l)
|
>200 mg/dl (>
11.1 mmol/l)
|
Am really grateful and thankful for what Dr Omole has done for me and my family.I Was having Herpes for good two years with no solution, the diseases almost took my life and because I was unable to work and I was also losing lots of money for medication,but one faithful day when I went online, I met lots of testimonies about this great man Dr Omole so I decided to give it a try and to God be the glory he did it. He cured me and I was free from this disease within two weeks and am so happy and so pleased to Write about him today. if you need his help or you also want to get cured just the way I got mine, Via Tel'';+2347042161766 on Whatsapp Or email, (dromoleherbalhome48@gmail.com ) and get your healing. He has cure for other deadly diseases like Diabetes,Hpv,Herpes,Hiv/Aids,Hepatitis,Als,Cancer. And also on his facebook page; https://www.facebook.com/dromoleherbalhome/
ReplyDelete