The basic human prototype is, in one respect, female
The larger a chromosome is, the more important is its role in maintaining
life. The X chromosome is in fact a
rather large chromosome which functions essentially as does a medium-sized
autosome. In sheer size it comes closest
to the eleventh chromosome, which by
definition is the eleventh largest. It
programs the creation of a diversity of amino acids, proteins, enzymes and so
forth. It is really just the tiny Y chromosome which determines the sex of the
progeny, namely maleness. Why is this so
? In fact, biologically speaking the male can be
considered a slight complication of the basic biological prototype of the human
species, which is female. A person who is born the victim of a
chromosomal aberration such as having only one X chromosome, ought,
arithmetically, to look half male and half female. Recall that the father carries an X and a Y
chromosome, and the mother carries two X
chromosomes. However, the person born with only an X chromosome,
although very androgynous, looks more like a female. As we shall see in detail later, this
condition is called Turner's syndrome. A person who, for any number of reasons,
has an interruption of the developmental cascade leading to the male
phenotype, will essentially look like a
female. Humans do not need chromosomes
or gonads or sex-specific hormones to look female. But they do need all of these things to look
male.
It is of note that the chain of transformation
(synthesis) of molecules from sterol to testosterone (the male hormone)
involves an intermediary step which is estrogen (the female hormone). Both
estradiol and testosterone (as well as the other steroids) are highly lipophilic (fat solubile) and thus easily
pass through the lipid bilayer of cells. Thus intracellular concentrations of
steroids are related to actual circulating levels. What determines whether a cell responds to a
steroid is either what sorts of cell-surface receptors it has (so-called
nongenomic effects of steroids and maybe better termed cell-surface effects)
and what sort of intracellular receptors it has. A great many cells clearly have intracellular
androgen receptors, thus there are many actions of androgen where it is acting
as an androgen and not as estrogen. Many
many cells have estrogen receptors as well as the enzymes to convert some
androgens to estrogens. It is within
these cells that testosterone (or any other aromatizable androgen) can enter
the cell, be converted to estrogen, and then activate estrogen receptors. But
only a very small percentage (<1%) of testosterone is ever converted to
estrogen in the mammalian brain. Nevertheless that small percentage does have
behavioral effects in rats and ferrets.
There is not yet any evidence of this eventuality in humans. Testosterone ( androgen) is present in the
blood plasma in bound (approximately 96%) and unbound, free (approximately 4%)
forms. It is the free form which is
lipophilic (water soluble) and can easily pass across cell membranes into the cell cytoplasm where it is bound to
the androgen receptor . This is the
reason there is the condition known as « androgen
insensitivity » -because people
with this condition do not have enough of the receptor or it is an abnormal
form. In a normal male mammal, the hormone receptor complex enters the nucleus
where it activates protein synthesis of "male" proteins, etc. At
one time it was thought, by some, that androgens could only penetrate brain
cells by first being converted to estrogens.
This, however, is now known not to be so.
Sexual behavior of sheep can be radically reversed by
prenatal hormonal manipulation. A single
injection of testosterone into the pregnant ewe, after her progeny has aleady been
morphologically fully feminized, may
nevertheless fully masculinize the progeny’s sexual behavior. Upon arrival of the first sexual action, the female progeny behaves exactly like a ram
and not at all like an ewe. Sheep sex is
hormonally robotic in this respect.
This is not the case for humans.
The brain metabolism of sex hormones is complex and remains mysterious.
Fetuses exposed to excessive doses of estrogen may, at
certain doses, in fact be masculinized,
not only in body appearance but also in psychological make-up -but these effects depend on the tissues
under consideration, the timing of the dose, and on the species under
consideration. For example, estrogen,
derived from circulating testosterone, masculinizes the developing preoptic
area of the brain in some species. This nucleus is one of the most sexually dimorphic brain
nuclei. It is important to understand
that artificial or abnormal prenatal hormonal effects may produce distinct
effects: masculinization,
demasculinization, feminization, or defeminization. It is not easy to be sure which of these is
taking place in artificial or abnormal prenatal hormonal conditions. It is believed that in normal development of
a male rat’s brain, the animal is
masculinized first (prenatally) and defeminized later (postnatally). It is believed that this is so because the
brain only develops receptors specific to estrogen around the time of birth and
not before. In mammals, it is believed that it is harder to
masculinize a female because very early on in prenatal development she secretes
a molecule in her blood,
alpha-feto-protein, which
prevents testosterone from masculinizing her.
This innocuous little piece of neuroendocrinology could help explain
some remarkable sex differences which are still leaving psychologists
puzzled: for example, why are there so
many more diverse paraphylias in the male sex than in the female sex in
humans (see chapter 2), and why are sexual identity and sexual
orientation very much more fragile in the male sex than in the female sex in
humans (see chapter 6) ? However, even
though brain development makes mysterious use of sex hormones, we must not lose sight of the bigger
picture: normal young women have about
three to five times more estrogen circulating in their blood than normal young
men do, making estrogen, clearly, a
«female» hormone.
Post Comment
No comments